Killi
   
curve

Phylogeny of Gobiidae and identification of gobiid lineages

THACKER, CHRISTINE E.; ROJE, DAWN M. (2011). . Systematics and Biodiversity, 9(4), 329–347. doi:10.1080/14772000.2011.629011


2019_McCraney

Phylogeny and Divergence Times of Gobiarian Fishes

Gobiarian fishes, exemplified by gobies, sleepers and cardinalfishes, have radiated across coastal marine and aquatic habitats worldwide, yet the biological traits deemed responsible for generating their great diversity, such as small body size, short generation times, and ecomorphological specialization, have also hindered resolution of their phylogeny. The current classification of Gobiaria is based on molecular phylogenetics, and while broad relationships among major groups have largely been settled by independent investigations, the placement of all higher taxa have not been verified with multilocus data. The root topology recovered from different molecular datasets is contentious, with multilocus and phylogenomic studies resolving nursery and cardinalfishes either in reciprocal or sequential sister clades to other gobiarians, and this deep systematic controversy questions the current two-order classification. Here I used two complementary approaches to resolve the phylogeny of Gobiaria. In my first study I mined public databases to assemble a sparse supermatrix of 23 genes and construct a phylogenetic tree with dense taxon sampling, comprised of approximately 30 percent of the more than 2,400 known gobiarian species. In my second study I generated new ultraconserved element sequence data to assemble a phylogenomic matrix of 704 genes, construct a phylogenetic tree with comprehensive sampling of higher taxa, and estimate a timescale for diversification under the relaxed molecular clock. Overall my studies produced more evidence in support of the current two-order classification of Gobiaria, and revealed the root uncertainty is a result of ancient incomplete lineage sorting. I also discovered that collared wrigglers (Xenisthmus spp.) form a monophyletic clade separate from sleepers (Eleotridae), and recommend recognizing family Xenisthmidae in the clade-based classification of Gobiaria. I dated origination of Gobiaria in the youngest age of the Early Cretaceous (104 Ma), found major clades of gobies, sleepers, and cardinalfishes diverged in the early Eocene (~50 Ma), and placed goby lineage diversification in the Oligocene and Miocene. In summary, my studies support the current two-order classification placing nursery and cardinalfishes in Kurtiformes and the remaining gobiarian fishes in Gobiiformes, confirm the clade-based phylogenetic classification of gobiarian families, and advance evidence for recognizing collared wrigglers in family Xenisthmidae.


2020_McCraney

Supermatrix phylogeny resolves goby lineages and reveals unstable root of Gobiaria

Gobies, sleepers, and cardinalfishes represent major clades of a species rich radiation of small bodied, ecologically diverse percomorphs (Gobiaria). Molecular phylogenetics has been crucial to resolving broad relationships of sleepers and gobies (Gobioidei), but the phylogenetic placements of cardinalfishes and nurseryfishes, as reciprocal or sequential sister clades to Gobioidei, are uncertain. In order to evaluate relationships among and within families we used a phylogenetic data mining approach to generate densely sampled trees inclusive of all higher taxa. We utilized conspecific amino acid homology to improve alignment accuracy, included ambiguously identified taxa to increase taxon sampling density, and resampled individual gene alignments to filter rogue sequences before concatenation. This approach yielded the most comprehensive tree yet of Gobiaria, inferred from a sparse (17 percent-complete) supermatrix of one ribosomal and 22 protein coding loci (18,065 characters), comprised of 50 outgroup and 777 ingroup taxa, representing 32 percent of species and 68 percent of genera. Our analyses confirmed the lineage-based classification of gobies with strong support, identified sleeper clades with unforeseen levels of systematic uncertainty, and quantified competing phylogenetic signals that confound resolution of the root topology. We also discovered that multilocus data completeness was related to maximum likelihood branch support, and verified that the phylogenetic uncertainty of shallow relationships observed within goby lineages could largely be explained by supermatrix sparseness. These results demonstrate the potential and limits of publicly available sequence data for producing densely-sampled phylogenetic trees of exceptionally biodiverse groups.










 encycloquaria.com